Baidu
map
ATMOS RES 润色咨询

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH

出版年份：1986 年文章数：3600 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Monthly 自引率：20.4% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 Gym璨烨

    审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？

    1

    展开1条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-28 衣谷

    关键词能否从题目中提炼？

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-03 ms9669734295150018

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-17 ms2535923852153051

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-15 ms272453986362045

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-11-12 ms5619336576777824

    地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。
    submit: 06/16/2019
    under revision: 07/23/2019
    submit revised version: 09/18/2019
    under review: 10/06/2019
    pending decision: 10/16/2019
    accepted: 10/28/2019
    online:10/29/2019

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-09-06 ms4600813998468978

    received september 2017
    received in revised form march 2018
    accepted may 2018

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-08-19 ms8261913720762277

    大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-07-24 ms4729674192825029

    received at editorial office: 2018.04.17
    revised requested: 2018.06.01
    article revised: 2018.07.18
    article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23
    2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=83, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=74, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=152, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修 一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=159, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。<br> submit: 06/16/2019<br> under revision: 07/23/2019<br> submit revised version: 09/18/2019<br> under review: 10/06/2019<br> pending decision: 10/16/2019<br> accepted: 10/28/2019<br> online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=158, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017<br> received in revised form march 2018<br> accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=163, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17<br> revised requested: 2018.06.01<br> article revised: 2018.07.18<br> article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23<br> 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=153, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右<br> 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=130, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-06-28 ms4294801609865205

    2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右
    投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57

    0

共21条页码: 1/3页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map